<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Carbon trading, taxes and putting the cart before the horse</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenleapforward.com/2009/10/13/carbon-trading-taxes-and-putting-the-cart-before-the-horse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenleapforward.com/2009/10/13/carbon-trading-taxes-and-putting-the-cart-before-the-horse/</link>
	<description>Tracking the emerging technological, commercial, political and social revolution that is greening China's red-hot economy.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 09:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Understanding China’s Position on Climate Change, and Repositioning Global Discussions &#187; ThunderPost</title>
		<link>http://greenleapforward.com/2009/10/13/carbon-trading-taxes-and-putting-the-cart-before-the-horse/#comment-27919</link>
		<dc:creator>Understanding China’s Position on Climate Change, and Repositioning Global Discussions &#187; ThunderPost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenleapforward.com/?p=215#comment-27919</guid>
		<description>[...] some great insights for firms who are operating in China, or who are trying to understand the “China position“.  It is a paper whose bias is very middle ground, and does not look to promote either side [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some great insights for firms who are operating in China, or who are trying to understand the “China position“.  It is a paper whose bias is very middle ground, and does not look to promote either side [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Green Leap Forward 绿跃进 &#187; The &#8220;how much&#8221; and &#8220;how to&#8221; of China&#8217;s goal to reduce carbon intensity</title>
		<link>http://greenleapforward.com/2009/10/13/carbon-trading-taxes-and-putting-the-cart-before-the-horse/#comment-27603</link>
		<dc:creator>The Green Leap Forward 绿跃进 &#187; The &#8220;how much&#8221; and &#8220;how to&#8221; of China&#8217;s goal to reduce carbon intensity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenleapforward.com/?p=215#comment-27603</guid>
		<description>[...] tax is going to come later rather than sooner.  We discussed in this in a previous post (&#8221;Carbon trading, taxes and putting the cart before the horse&#8220;)&#8211;Jiang Kejun of the Energy Resources Institute, a government think tank for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tax is going to come later rather than sooner.  We discussed in this in a previous post (&#8221;Carbon trading, taxes and putting the cart before the horse&#8220;)&#8211;Jiang Kejun of the Energy Resources Institute, a government think tank for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Understanding China’s Position on Climate Change, and Repositioning Global Discussions &#124; Cleaner Greener China</title>
		<link>http://greenleapforward.com/2009/10/13/carbon-trading-taxes-and-putting-the-cart-before-the-horse/#comment-27529</link>
		<dc:creator>Understanding China’s Position on Climate Change, and Repositioning Global Discussions &#124; Cleaner Greener China</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenleapforward.com/?p=215#comment-27529</guid>
		<description>[...] great insights for firms who are operating in China, or who are trying to understand the &#8220;China position&#8220;.  It is a paper whose bias is very middle ground, and does not look to promote either side [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] great insights for firms who are operating in China, or who are trying to understand the &#8220;China position&#8220;.  It is a paper whose bias is very middle ground, and does not look to promote either side [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

