<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: China&#8217;s Innovation Model and its Role in the Global Clean Energy Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://greenleapforward.com/2010/07/31/chinas-innovation-model-and-its-role-in-the-global-clean-energy-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://greenleapforward.com/2010/07/31/chinas-innovation-model-and-its-role-in-the-global-clean-energy-market/</link>
	<description>Tracking the emerging technological, commercial, political and social revolution that is greening China's red-hot economy.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 17:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yingni Lu</title>
		<link>http://greenleapforward.com/2010/07/31/chinas-innovation-model-and-its-role-in-the-global-clean-energy-market/#comment-66354</link>
		<dc:creator>Yingni Lu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://greenleapforward.com/?p=279#comment-66354</guid>
		<description>Interesting and insightful article.  I agree with the incremental technology point.  Obviously China is famous for import-digest-reinnovate, which doesn't earn much good reputation for us.  However, I'd say this method is more suitable for improvement in manufacturing. Our education doesn't teach us how to do industrial design, which is very important to take 'reinnovate' to the next stage and the missing link in Chinese R&#38;D culture.  I study innovation management as my MBA subject in Imperial College. I can tell you how important it is for innovators to protect their IP and so many of them gave up the huge market opportunities in China because of IPR infringement.  Probably that is something that we really need to think about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting and insightful article.  I agree with the incremental technology point.  Obviously China is famous for import-digest-reinnovate, which doesn&#8217;t earn much good reputation for us.  However, I&#8217;d say this method is more suitable for improvement in manufacturing. Our education doesn&#8217;t teach us how to do industrial design, which is very important to take &#8216;reinnovate&#8217; to the next stage and the missing link in Chinese R&amp;D culture.  I study innovation management as my MBA subject in Imperial College. I can tell you how important it is for innovators to protect their IP and so many of them gave up the huge market opportunities in China because of IPR infringement.  Probably that is something that we really need to think about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

